From GuildWiki

Contents 1 Nothing to see here, either 2 Your sig ... 3 Good job 4 BRAKE U LIKE SUMMER TWIG 5 Styg echo dust 6 "I meant to do that!" 7 Let me know

[edit] Nothing to see here, either

move along... -- Snograt 09:42, 18 November 2006 (CST)

test Snograt ^{talk here} 15:04, 20 November 2006 (CST)

Your profile is made of God and Win good sir. Anyone who makes a profile here that actually updates what they do should be beaten. This isn't Mycult ffs. Kamahl the Fist 21:10, 11 February 2007 (CST)

er, right. ...What? Snograt ^{talk here} 18:51, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Might want to revert his changes to your user page. And FWIW, I have no idea what the guy is talking about either. --Dirigible 18:59, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Now that's bizarre - you were my first and only "talkee" on the "official" wiki, Dirigible :) --Snograt ^{talk here} 19:03, 15 February 2007 (CST)

[edit] Your sig ...

... breaks GW:SIGN. Use of sup tag isn't allowed. -- (gem / talk) 19:55, 19 May 2007 (CDT)

Ye gods - this sig's almost as old as the wiki! Heh, I seem to remember the sig discussion over in the other place - I only posted a message here cos I needed info about offwiki :) I will sort it out for you, Mr Gem sir ^^ --Snograt talk here 20:03, 19 May 2007 (CDT)

Hehe. :) Thanks, I'll return to deleting stuff which I find quite amusing when not able to make others suffer with their sigs and missing credits. ;P -- (gem / talk) 20:36, 19 May 2007 (CDT)

Ahhh, that's better - this sig's like an old, comfortable pair of shoes :) --Snograt 21:27, 25 May 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Good job

Nice work cleaning up after that guy tonight.  :) --Rainith 03:39, 1 July 2007 (CDT)

Thanks - it sort of reminded me of the Hollywood depiction of hackers, where the best hacker is the one who types fastest :D --Snograt 03:41, 1 July 2007 (CDT)

[edit] BRAKE U LIKE SUMMER TWIG

SNIP SNAP SIinky 16:08, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

Hello Mr Vandal - how are you today? --Snograt 01:33, 3 July 2007 (CDT)

I VANDLIZE NOTHING GTFO OUT

lol:P —ShadyGuy 16:58, 3 July 2007 (CDT)

Your capitals are vandalising my nice, clean talk page - shoo! --Snograt 18:31, 3 July 2007 (CDT)

caps LOCK CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL IMO SIinky 00:33, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

Lol - Slinky,(or is it SIinky?) - you one crazy guy ^^ --Snograt 04:56, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

WOW TAKE A GRAMMAR CLASS PLS SIinky 17:26, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

Not you again SIinky. Seriously, don't you have anything better to do than come here and vandalize pages or post nonsensical builds (can't anymore)? (T/C) 17:33, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

Heh, look on the bright side, Entropy - it's on my talk page, not in the main! Also, I can't believe that my grammar was just questioned :D --Snograt 18:01, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

DONT TOUCH MESIinky 02:38, 7 July 2007 (CDT)

(reset indent) - No comment, just wanted to reset that huge indent ^^ --Snograt 12:45, 7 July 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Styg echo dust

Can you tell what's the rate of LB points gain? any chance it's better than the 'remains of' ss/lb run? Foo 05:11, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

The Sulfurous Wastes still has a better rate, assuming you still have access to the quest there. If, like me, you solo-trap veil in HM, you will find that you can usually finish off the first two groups of 18 - so that's 36*8=288 points per run. Usually. Even if you place the same traps in the same place with the same timings, sometimes one or two critters just manage to escape. As I run with 3 superiors and 255 health, it's one-hit time.

As it happens, I finished off my LB title the other day through farming the Foundry with two friends. That seemed to be much quicker, and the 6 Titan gems in 3 attempts made it worthwhile :)

When all is said and done, I believe the "Remains of" run with the quest active is quicker and easier, whereas the DoA runs are more profitable and FUN! --Snograt 06:01, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

Thanks. Foo 07:29, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

[edit] "I meant to do that!"

I don't agree with you. Name me more than five movies in which this line appears, connected with a character being knocked down. And while you do it, you might also help me with a general problem I have. Why are Wiki guys so eager to delete content? For every single thing I wanted to ad to any Wiki I had to fight. I thought Wikis were about collecting knowledge together. So why does every Wiki have some "selected" people who rule it and delete everything which new users write? Sorry for annoying you like this because of a minor problem, but it can get on your nerves to have everything deleted that you write ;) --- 84.141.84.199 08:10, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

Okay, regarding what you guys say on the discussion page, I see that I won't come through with it this time. Maybe they fail to translate it right, so I haven't heard it so often in German movies. ^^ So, nerver mind, but if you cloud explain the other thing to me, I would be really grateful :) --- 84.141.84.199 08:15, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

"I haven't heard it so often in German movies" - ah, it all becomes clear! Heh, seriously, this is a very common line that is used for comic effect when a character does something embarrassing like fall over. As to your second comment, I really hope it isn't really like that. You will see the same names often reverting vandalism and correcting obvious errors, but that is understandable. Personally, I spend a lot of time "patrolling" recent changes, mainly just to see news as it comes in but also to catch any vandalism as soon as it happens. In cases such as this, however, it's slightly different. The content of the various "Trivia" sections is something that is often hotly contested. A lot of skill names have been attributed to recent pop song titles, movie quotes and the like, but are often co-incidental or totally wrongly attributed. One way these sort of issues can be sorted out is by going to the official wiki and leaving a note on the talk page of Emily Diehl. She has, several times, confirmed or denied the source of various trivias (triviae? trivii??). Finally, don't gt put off by what you may see as long term user elitism - we're really not like that! (well, most of us anyway). Oh, and register an account - join the happy throng! --Snograt 00:46, 25 August 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Let me know

If you want the secretgw domain re-established. We can do it easily enough for you. Sorry about that Penchina 02:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Wow, someone in power! Seems to be fine, thanks - all the problems I've had are not the fault of Wikia, or even GWG. Just the over-zealous security software at work :) Heh, I really shouldn't be editing at work, but what the hey? --Snograt 19:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Meh, put a message on his talk page months ago - not even the courtesy of a response. Looks like the money-men have stopped trying to please us huddled masses. --Snograt 13:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

*blows dust off of talk page* - I never did hear from Gil again. On the positive side, I just discovered that guildwars.wikia.com is not blocked at my workplace. Yay, time for some research :D --Snograt 23:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked again - bloody filters :/ --Snograt 18:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Never deal with the higher-ups for this kind of thing; kick the tech people instead. :p (T/C) 18:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

It was all academic anyway - not Wikia's fault I'm blocked - even secretgw would have been caught sooner rather than later. --Snograt 22:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Bored enough to enter a postscript. My employers have cracked down even harder, to the extent where even the dontcesorme.org .6a.nl suffix proxy is blocked. The filtering is so strict that it filters out a lot of our work-related sites - I can't even order stationery any more. Twats. Oddly, though, most wikia stuff is now allowed (presumably to allop wikipedia) so I'm back watching RC on the ol' site :) PvX is blocked, though :( --Snograt 00:49, September 30, 2009 (UTC)