From GuildWiki

[edit] Signature

Hi, looks like you're trying to build a custom signature. You might be interested in this: GuildWiki:Request_assistance#Custom_Sig. --Ab.Er.Rant (msg Aberrant80) 22:47, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Thanks, I think I have it set up the right way now :) ---- Jahuteskye (talk) 23:01, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Looks like you should check GuildWiki:Sign your comments/P1. It's got some policies relevant to the images in your sig. — HarshLanguage 05:03, 30 January 2007 (CST)

I see that there has been a proposed guideline that states that the images in signatures should be unique -- Oh well, quick and easy use of the print screen button should remedy this problem! Thanks for the heads up.---- Jahuteskye (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2007 (CST)

It was made GuildWiki policy on Jan. 15 since there was no opposition. — HarshLanguage 06:24, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Do you reckon you could make your sig less of an assault on the eyes!? The colours are waaaay to full on at the moment. Thanks. --Xasxas256 05:27, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Haha, sure -- this sig wasn't intended to be permanent -- just figuring out HOW to do it really -- (talk) 05:28, 30 January 2007 (CST)

I hate to say this, but your sig icon is too wide. The policy allows a sig icon width up to 50 pixels. -- (talk) 07:06, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Hmm... The max width makes little sense to me -- it'd be wider if I just used the standard Jahuteskye link! I can understand if someone was abusing it, but if I make it any shorter I wouldnt be able to fit my name on there! At this point, it seems to me that it is less of an "icon" and more of an image-based signature -- (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2007 (CST)

It also says "be sparing with color"...change it, or use the normal vanilla sig for now! My poor eyes :( --Xasxas256 07:14, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Didn't you notice the newer version? The lst one used on this page. It has nice, non-bright colors. -- (talk) 07:17, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Still looks like a lot of colours to me! I mean it's an improvement but...I'm still not a fan! --Xasxas256 07:19, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Make sure you aren't working off of a cached version... my current version has arguably duller colors than the standard blue link!-- (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Yeah, I don't understand how that light 'almost white' can be disturbing. -- (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)

To me, both sigs are terrific. But ya, that later one is less of an optical battery. -- Oblio (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2007 (CST)

[edit] SoR Monk

BrianG preferred to have a PvP as well as a PvE version of an SoR Monk. I believe, since the original SoR was a PvE build, we should probably resume editing on your version in [[Build:Mo/E SoR Monk]]. Sorry for any confusion this may have caused. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 23:30, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Thanks for helping me work this out, I really appreciate it! -- (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2007 (CST)