Gaming
 
[Glamtre]

Glamtre 1,459 edits since August 25, 2006

1,459

From GuildWiki

Contents

[edit] User Page

I see you've started to get things done on your user page. Its looking good so far, tell me if you need any help. Oh, and thanks for noting me at the bottom. :-) have fun. --Image:DualAttack.png Kirbman 20:04, 4 March 2007 (CST)

[edit] FYI

Item mods are never listed in the title here at guildwiki. —Image:BlastThatT.jpgBlastedt 17:33, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

Could you be more specific? Glamtre 17:40, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
he probably means we don't have an article for Barbed Ascalon Razor of Enchanting, only Ascalon Razor --Honorable Sarah image:Honorable_Icon.gif 01:16, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
I did figure that out. My point to the original change was that the items in question were from the pre-order packs and, although some of them had mods in their description that were in fact unique items and should be treated (from an article stand point) the same as Green items. Glamtre 01:19, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
inerta is a real concept on a wiki. the Nevermore Flatbow was a preorder item back when the prophecies campaign was "guild wars: comming soon!". you'd need a compelling reason to move 2+ years of history --Honorable Sarah image:Honorable_Icon.gif 01:45, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
Agreed, most of my frustration is in the poor search engine on MediaWiki sites. It can take several minutes to find an article you know exists. I am fine with the redirect solution. My only remaining question (from a process point of view using this incident as the example) is that since a Move creates a legacy redirect is is better to Move the article to a more descriptive name that more closely matches existing standard or create a the new page with the more descriptive name and add a redirect to the existing legacy page? Inquiring Minds Want to Know! Glamtre 01:54, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
I agree with having articles named the same as the unique pre-order item, and not have them be redirects to a generic name. These are unique items, they do not have salvageable mods - the proper name for the item just happens to have a mod name in it. To me, this is just as deserving of having the article named the same as the weapon as is Kepkhet's Refuge, Icy Dragon Sword, or Drago's Flatbow. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 10:50, 28 March 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Characters

Enough characters? Talk about obsessed..03:16, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

I've seen more... I know one person who has 4 GW accounts, all with expansions on them. --Lania ElderfireMy Talk 00:52, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
I only have these two accounts, any more than that and I would no longer have a job! -- Image:Axe-icon-left.png Glamtre Image:Axe-icon-right.png (Talk) 19:33, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Credits

I'm happy that you considered me "worthy" to credit ^^ I warms me to see someone being inspired by my work, one way or the other :P — Poki#3 My Talk Page :o, 05:42, 29 May 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Titles

Me and some other guy made some title boxes for the new titles introduced in GW:EN, enjoy! --Image:DualAttack.png Kirbman 03:37, 5 September 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Charr Salvage Kit

Nice work! --◄mendel► 19:23, September 7, 2009 (UTC)