From GuildWiki

[edit] Category:Locations vs Category:Location

Why are you changing everything to Locations? Location was fine. No need for the S. --Talrath Stormcrush 12:29, 15 Aug 2005 (EST)

Um, there were more entries in locationS than location so i thought all the location ones were typos. also they all seemed to be by the same guy, furthering my belief they were typos :/ - Crusty

Hrmm. You may be right. I'm jumping at straws because we've had problems in the past with people restructuring and renaming as they like. Continue with that.

However, on the mission locations: The proper syntax is that just the mission name redirects to the (Mission) entry, and that the (location) entry contains the other info. --Talrath Stormcrush 12:38, 15 Aug 2005 (EST)

It wasn't intuitive what was going on there so i just tried to leave the whole mission thing alone - Crusty

I think it was decided categories were plural, also. --Fyren 13:18, 15 Aug 2005 (EST)

Confirmed: categories are, generally, plural. —Tanaric 15:45, 16 Aug 2005 (EST)

[edit] Naughty Naughty >:/

I appreciate your work on the bestiary; however, we don't create empty stubs on GuildWiki, as it makes maintenence hellish. Please stub out your devourer articles (and any other empties you may have created) so that they're useful, or mark them for deletion. This doesn't require much work: a little information on where they spawn, what levels they are, and what profession's skills they use would be enough for a quick stub. —Tanaric 15:49, 16 Aug 2005 (EST)

[edit] blah, soldier's armor

I think it introduces more confusion when you say "They all have the same bonus, except one piece of this one does not have the same bonus." I would personally prefer a revert for the original wording for all 3 articles. -SolaPan 11:28, 21 March 2006 (CST)

personally I dont think headgear should be classified as being part of an armor set, but thats another story. The entry before mine referenced 2 sets of armor but then went on to say "all three sets of armor do blah blah blah ..." (or something to that effect). I was confused so I editted it so it made more sense to me. Crusty 11:07, 22 March 2006 (CST)