Talk:Zombie

From GuildWiki

They're undead, not zombies. And Rotscale is a Dragon species, which means he won't take double damage from holy attacks. Railin 09:24, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

I'd say delete it, but I don't know how the tag works XD. Dragnmn talk 11:07, 2 August 2007 (CDT)

According to the Undead page, these are all listed as a subcategory of undead which are not vulnerable to holy damage. Now, it was my understanding that vulnerablity to holy damage was a defining factor of being undead. So why are these classified as undead at all? How was this determined? Do they respond to a deathbane mod but not skill-inflicted holy damage? Who tested this and how? More information is clearly needed. —♥Jedi♥Rogue♥ 22:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Um...Damned Cleric, Executioner, Grasping Ghoul, etc. are vulnerable to Holy damage, at least the last time I played. (Smoke Phantom is not.) So I am not even sure what the purpose of this category is. Undead Prince Rurik responds to Deathbane but not Holy damage so that would make more sense. Anyways, inclined to delete... (T/C) 11:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Also note, there's no actual "Category:Zombies", only Category:Undead and some sub-cats, so looking more like this just one of those off-shoot articles, any critter that is invulnerable to Holy Damage will likely have it noted on their individual pages anyway. --Wolfie (talk|contribs) 11:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)