Talk:Wurm

From GuildWiki

How do you guys know they are warrior if they dont use any skills? They could be Monk too or something.

It's been agreed by community consensus that Wurm is a Warrior-class monster. The only exception (maybe) is Siege Wurms and the like, since they attack from range. Anyways, don't just change the species without discussing it first... Entropy 22:10, 4 February 2007 (CST)

Due to their attack speed and damage dealt, Sand Wurms are assumed to be Hammer Wielding warriors, this is also inferred from the skills used by Chaos Wurms in the Ruins of the Tomb of the Primeval Kings which are hammer based. -- Sand Wurm .... Same reasoning behind this I suppose. --RabiesTurtle 22:26, 4 February 2007 (CST)

Actially Actually, the anon is right. There's nothing to confirm that these are Warriors (although I'm 110% sure they aren't Monks). Removed it. Look at species page. I'm thinking some prof sync-ing is in order. As for being inferred, I'm thinking unless the evidence is very strong, assumptions really shouldn't be listed as fact unless specifically noted in a notes section. --Ab.Er.Rant (msg Aberrant80) 22:29, 4 February 2007 (CST)

>< 24.6.147.36 22:34, 4 February 2007 (CST)

I don't think they're warriors --Blue.rellik 21:43, 11 June 2007 (CDT)

HM anyone? Their profession could be confirmed by the tome they drop

That'll be fun. There's only like 2 or 3 in the entire game and it isn't exactly easy to reach them and hope they drop a tome. I'm up for the challenge though, I like wurms :D --Blue.rellik 09:59, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

They are warriors and drop warrior tomes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.78.20.210 (contribs) 23:54, 10 July 2007.

they just dropped a monk tome!11111111oneoneeleven => screen?

Ehh, you mean you have a screen of it dropping a monk tome? -- Xeon 07:17, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

i want to say: no screen = no proof :S im still sure theyre monks <.< xD 84.146.173.21 14:18, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

they guy that said they drop war tomes, posted the same on Sand Wurm talk page :S maybe undo his/her edit? theres still no proof =/ 84.146.140.191 12:53, 24 July 2007 (CDT)

Well there's some silly rule about good faith and whatnot so we should take his word for it. --Blue.rellik 21:29, 12 September 2007 (CDT)