Due to the lack of clarity in the merchant/armorer window of the level of coolness of the appearance of helms I believe that it warrents documentation.
Why the f is this a Candidate for Deletion?? I'd rather say it's an urgent Candidate for Completion. --Tetris L 00:40, 24 Aug 2005 (EST)
Same think that tetris said. Why all categories are this section fill and not this. Urgent to fill that and remove from cancelation--stonebeard
A table like all other professions have would be useful, if some1 gets the tempalte table together, im pretty sure it will be filled soon --HJT 23:00, 6 Oct 2005 (EST)
now we must only find some1 to fill all these cute tables^^ --HJT 02:12, 25 October 2005 (EST)
My Most Recent Contribution Edit
I removed the Piken Square crafter from the non-set helmet table, having confirmed that he doesn't craft them. Just in case someone wondered. And as for filling the table in question, I'm working on it. Will just take a while to get my warrior that far in the game. --Sorya 15:05, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- I added the AL ratings for the missing cities. The Lieutenant's helm, as shown, is lower AL at 60. Since the AL affects the whole row, I just added the note with the AL rating. Please change if you think there is a better way to display this. --Vortexsam 06:29, 18 March 2006 (CST)
are all these headgear articles out of date? Edit
working on this tonight. this will be three i've updated, does no one else look at these? --Honorable Sarah 13:38, 19 July 2006 (CDT)
- Mesmer is up-to-date. -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 14:45, 19 July 2006 (CDT)
This took me the whole day. Seriously. I've been working with it since 9 this morning, only taking a lunch brake... (it's 19:43 here atm)
Please, remember to post your opinions about this new idea about the headgear articles.
| -- Helena 12:44, 30 September 2006 (CDT)
Why do we need two Edit
Why do we need two articles on this ... Warrior Attribute Headgears and Warrior Headgear. To match the other professions, the only page existing should be Attribute Headgears. However the layout of this page is more consistent with how its supposed to look so it has to be merged in some way. Everyone agree? --MasterPatricko 13:41, 4 October 2006 (CDT)