Talk:Title skill
From GuildWiki
The progressions for the Nightfall skills actually work the same as normal skills. Your Sunspear rank is multiplied by 1.5, rounded down and used as the "attribute." Everything after that is the same: from the values at 0 and 15 you can calculate the others and the green numbers in game are 0...12. I'd guess that Factions skills use 1.2 for their multiplier, but there's not enough data on the wiki right now to check. (Between Gordon's table in the signet of illusions article and the progressions people manually added I was able to figure out the Nightfall skills, but there's much less progression data for the Factions skills and no table like Gordon's.) --Fyren 12:57, 17 June 2007 (CDT)
- Since more progression data has been added, it seems the Factions skills use 1.3. Other explanations can probably be found for how either calculate their progressions, but this is the simplest I could come up with. --Fyren 22:28, 18 June 2007 (CDT)
- So, I have updated progression templates now, but we need to decide exactly what we're calling the attributes. At the moment we have "Sunspear Title" and "Allegiance rank" which obviously aren't consistent. --Fyren 09:42, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- in game its Sunspear Title Track, which i shortened to Sunspear Title otherwise it would bloat the box. I will be changing the rank one soon as well, just fell asleep yesterday. -- Xeon 11:21, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- So, I have updated progression templates now, but we need to decide exactly what we're calling the attributes. At the moment we have "Sunspear Title" and "Allegiance rank" which obviously aren't consistent. --Fyren 09:42, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
[edit] obsolete?
Hmm, this seems obsolete considering we have Sunspear qr and Alliance qr. Anyone else got any thoughts on this? -- Xeon 12:36, 18 June 2007 (CDT)
- I think we should keep it, since Eye of the North will include more title skills. -- Gordon Ecker 18:57, 18 June 2007 (CDT)
- Or not, now that there's PvE skills quick reference. I'll move it to title skill and turn it into a definition article. -- Gordon Ecker 19:16, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
- It's done. -- Gordon Ecker 19:32, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
[edit] sig of illusions
The remark on signet of illusions seems like its in the middle of something else. Could someone who knows what its all supposed to be reword it? —♥Jedi♥Rogue♥ 19:53, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
- I've cleaned up the note. -- Gordon Ecker 20:45, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
