Gaming
 

GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick (2)

From GuildWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Contents

[edit] Warwick (talk • contribs)

I figured that since hell was gonna apply, i might as well. if you want to check my contribs, check on the button on my signature. I follow the policies to the letter and know them, since i was bored and i read them =P --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 18:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Since its me thats applying, i accept! --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 18:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Warwick withdrew his acceptance on 6-2-08

[edit] Support

  1. Go for it, your contribs are always valid. RT | Talk 19:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    /ishappy that somone voted for him --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 19:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. I like people who are funny. and cool. you are have good intelligence too. -- Feardrake. 19:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    I'm funny, cool and intelligent? xD --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Even though your time on this Wiki may be short... I feel by looking over your contribs, that you are an active player and supporter of this wiki. With the shorthandedness of admins currently around here, it would be beneficial to the rest of the site to have as active of a member for the role. (and I was thinking about voting neutral, just because you have way too many user boxes) Image:Isk8.pngIsk8 20:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Many of which are mine I might point out.--Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpgigathrashTalk^Cont 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Most of them I've seen on other GW related wiki's userpages... and they are alot older than you. -- Feardrake. 20:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Actually, most of them Are his, since i stole about 300 userboxes from him =/ --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    GT was talking that many of those userboxes are his (and Warw stole a bunch of my userboxes too :O ) --- Image:VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 20:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    when i app'd i was pretty sure i wasnt gonna get adminship. I was probably right xD --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. I've known Warwick for quite a while, his Guild Wars IQ is pretty high, his always willing to help and he always has valid contributions-LiamB 13:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
    Thanks liam/medibuh ^_^ --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) (My RFA! (vote support) 14:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Yeh go for it i personally belive this wiki should have plenty of admins so repeated vandalisers get banned straight away rather than having to wait until an admin is online.--Image:Chris1645.JPG 15:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
    thanks for the support! I only just realised you posted, lol. I'll be watching the page. from now. --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) (My RFA! (vote support) 17:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

#He was my old guild leader, and he knows a lot about gw, so im voting support! Also he asked me to.. Apple Pie 17:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

  1. As a fully active Officer of My Guild I would like to nominate Warwick as a Admin for this site. He always has something constructive to say - Jimbo
    this really looks suspicious for me about sockpuppeting, but i am not O_o.. I just asked the members of my guild to vote for me.. --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (T)/(C) (RFA!) 19:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

  1. You enforce the policies. You help around the wiki. You revert vandals constantly. Yet, I still believe that you have not been here long enough to get administrative duties. Give it a few more months, however, and this vote may very well change.--Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 18:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. You stole every single one of my userboxes without even dropping me a note on my talk page, I don't think I can trust you in a position of power when you have such lenient morals as of now.--Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpgigathrashTalk^Cont 19:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    is that really a good reason to oppose? =/ --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 19:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    I don't consider you trustworthy, based on your previous actions to both me and Vipermagi, so yes it is valid.--Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpgigathrashTalk^Cont 19:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Lol. --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 19:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    As my theater instructor says "You are always auditioning."--Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpgigathrashTalk^Cont 19:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Call me irrational ,but I don't feel good about the idea of giving warwick sysop privileges at the moment. Here, there's the assumption that his perception on the matter is consensus enough, and he was forced to back down after various people disagreed. The pessimistic side of me says that if Warwick were an admin, it would have just been deleted and left at that, and looking for consensus on an issue like that is what I would have expected. This one is a bit personal, so I might be being biased, but warning someone for RVing vandalism seems a bit ridiculous, as well as the fact that he didn't notice the edits reverted were different entirely. This shows a lack of knowledge on policies on the wiki, although I screwed up there as well, and I think since then Warwick has made an effort to improve that. If that seemed all a bit negative, with the qualities described in Marco's vote, and some more experience, Warwick could have the potential to be a sysop. Lord of all tyria 19:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Fair enough. --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 19:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Btw LoaT, the book part, i thought that she was only adding the books from BMP, which would have been useless, then i didnt want to back down (Damn pride) --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) (My RFA! (vote support) 13:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
    Well that goes with the one on my talk page, research before action is good lol. Come back some time later and you'll probably get support off me. Lord of all tyria 13:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. Sorry, I think at the moment the wiki needs someone a bit more "experienced". --Mr Ex Vandal 20:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Hah, marco you were wrong! Haha! you said he'd vote for support! You owe me 10k! --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Wow.. just wow Image:Isk8.pngIsk8 20:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Wow what? --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. <Enter just about everything said above here> --- Image:VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 10:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. Warwick being mean to me and you haven't been here that long. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 19:21, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
    *Rolls eyes* --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (T)/(C) (RFA!) 19:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. Asking for guild members to 'vote' here shows that he doesn't understand that the RfA is about convincing the bureaucrat about the candidates abilities as a wiki sysop, not about how popular he is or how many votes he can garner. Since we don't have a bad lack of sysops and we are having one very good and supported sysop candidate already I'm changing from neutral to oppose. -- Gem (gem / talk) 21:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. All above reasons. Cress Arvein 01:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

  1. I have to go with gem which is down there. *points down* --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 18:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    You iz lazy.. --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 21:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Only here since october RT | Talk 18:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Yay, it was deleted! I now have a support yey! --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 22:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Cress Arvein 22:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Wuh, no reason? =O --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 22:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Cuz he can.--Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 23:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. I don't see a reason to support, but I don't see a reason to actually oppose either. -- Gem (gem / talk) 23:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    Fair enough =P --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 07:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. /agree with Gem. Not enough reason to support (yet), but no real reason to oppose either. --Shadowcrest 02:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. You have (mostly) a good character for an admin, but lack experience. I'm not opposed because I think you will eventually make a good job of it, but I can't support yet either. Image:Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 08:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
    I've probably got the most neutrals any nominee has had ever =P --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) (My RFA! (vote support) 08:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. Met him ingame, he doesn't seem so bad after all, still doesn't get my support though.--Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpgigathrashTalk^Cont 10:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
    yey. --Image:Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (T)/(C) (RFA!) 19:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. — ク Eloc 貢 13:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://guildwars.wikia.com/wiki/GuildWiki:Requests_for_adminship/Warwick_(2)"